5,200mAh or 10,400mAh, that is the question
The Xiaomi 5,200mAh Mi Power Bank probably needs little introduction, especially if you’ve read our review and teardown of its 10,400mAh sibling. At about 29% slimmer (55mm vs. 77mm in width; the differences in height and thickness are negligible) and 38% lighter (155g vs. 250g) than the latter, it’s bound to attract those who deem the 10,400mAh version expensive (really!?), too bulky to carry around, or those who don’t need to recharge their devices multiple times over.
We shan’t go into great length for this review, since most of what we’ve written for the 10,400mAh version also applies to this 5,200mAh version. In a nutshell, it has the same CNC-machined and anodized aluminum shell, the same button and input/output ports (albeit arranged slightly differently due to the smaller casing), and the same reliability and environmental testing results. The battery cells are again sourced from either LG or Samsung (just that it uses two cells instead of four) and the USB smart-control and power management chips come from Texas Instruments, so it has the same voltage, current, and temperature protection mechanisms just like the 10,400mAh Mi Power Bank.
So far, so good.
USB ports, status indicator, power check button - yup, they're all there.
The 5,200mAh Mi Power Bank is 29% slimmer and 38% lighter than its 10,400mAh sibling.
2 important differences
1.) Conversion rate
The first difference that caught our attention between the 5,200mAh and 10,400mAh Mi Power Banks is the former has a lower maximum conversion rate - more specifically, 85% vs. 93%. Broadly speaking, this means that while the 5,200mAh version has half the capacity of the 10,400mAh power bank, the number of recharges you get from the former isn’t exactly halved of what you’d get from the latter.
The numbers given by Xiaomi illustrate this clearly. For example, the 10,400mAh power bank is able to recharge the Mi 3 smartphone or iPhone 5S smartphone 2.5x or 4.5x respectively, but the 5,200mAh power bank is rated at 1x or 2x respectively. Figure for charging the iPad Mini tablet is omitted for the 5,200mAh power bank not because it doesn’t work on tablets (more on that later); more likely, it’s because it doesn’t have enough juice to recharge the tablet fully.
Oooh, what do we have here? That's two LG (LGEBB41865) battery cells, each 2,600mAh, for a total of 5,200mAh. And the red wires with a black blob at the end you see there? That's the temperature sensor.
that thing in the red frame looks to be a Texas Instruments TPS2514 USB power and charging port controller. The one in the green frame is an 8A fuse. On its left are a few more transistors in SOT-23 package, which we believe are N-channel MOSFETs and protection IC to protect the battery during over-charge, over-discharge, and over-current situations.
On the other side of the circuit board, we see the same 97F1204SMBN microcontroller (in pink frame) we've on the 10,400mAh version (made by ZM instead of ABOV?). The battery management I2C is different though: the 5,200mAh version uses the Texas Instruments BQ24295 (in yellow frame) instead of the BQ24195 found on the 10,400mAh version. That 1R0 thing you see at the bottom? That's likely to be an inductor.
For nerds interested in conversion rate, know that the 18650-type battery used by both Xiaomi power banks has an output voltage of 3.6V. This needs to be boosted to about 5V internally in order to supply the correct output for the smartphone or tablet. The conversion/boosting/current-switching process inevitably results in drops in efficiency. In reality, the overall (true?) conversion rate of power banks using 18650 batteries (i.e., one has to consider the efficiency of both the power management IC and the batteries used, among others) is usually around 60 to 65%, which looks to be the case for the 5,200mAh Mi Power Bank. The 10,400mAh seems to fare better; we estimated it to be around 70 to 75%.
2.) Output current
Another thing to note is the 5,200mAh Mi Power Bank has a maximum output current of 1.5A, lower than the 10,400mAh version’s 2.1A.
What this means is that if your devices accept more than 1.5A (usually tablets), then this 5,200mAh power bank won’t be able to recharge it as fast as the 10,400mAh power bank or a wall adapter that outputs 2.1/2.4A. Of course, considering its lower capacity and the fact that tablets typically use much bigger batteries than smartphones, it's fair to assume that this 5,200mAh power bank isn’t really designed with tablets in mind in the first place.
The 5,200mAh Mi Power Bank easily hit 1.5A output in our tests, and sometimes, even went beyond it.
That said, batteries used in smartphones are also getting bigger these days. Looking at its conversion efficiency, our recommendation is to skip the 5,200mAh version and go straight for the 10,400mAh version if your device’s battery capacity is higher than 3,100mAh.
On a separate note, the 5,200mAh Mi Power Bank accepts input current of up to 2.0A, so it shouldn’t take long to recharge its cells after a day’s use. According to Xiaomi, it takes about three hours if you use a 5V/2A USB adapter, or five hours if you use a 5V/1A adapter. Like the 10,400mAh power bank, you’ve to source and use your own adapter.
2A input allows the power bank to recharge its internal battery cells quickly.
Conclusion: Great value for smartphone users
So there you have it, our - cough - simple review of the 5,200mAh Mi Power Bank. To sum up, at S$8.99, it offers tremendous value for smartphone users. It’s compact, and it charges and recharges fast.
For tablet users, power users (pun fully intended) who use their phones heavily throughout the day, or those who don’t mind the additional bulk, the 10,400mAh version is the better choice.
These are what S$9 gets you!
Re-post from : www.hardwarezone.com.sg
Recently Search :
Malaysia Best Mobile Online Store
Malaysia Best Mobile Shop
Low Price Online Mobile Shop
Best Price Price for Mobile
Malaysia IT News Page
Malaysia IT News Website
.jpeg)
